Print
Cite
Feedback
Share

Introduction

Farm subsidies are financial assistance programs or incentives provided by governments to agricultural producers. These subsidies are designed to support farmers and the agricultural industry, often aiming to stabilize food prices, ensure a steady food supply, and support domestic farming industries.

Conservative Perspective

Conservatives are generally firm believers in the power of the free market. That being said, conservatives are divided on the issue of farm subsidies. Some conservatives argue that subsidizing the farming industry is key to protecting a critical domestic industry: food. As well, farmers (and others in rural settings) are quite often farmers.  As such, this sways some Conservative politicians to support their voters.

Anti Farm Subsidy View

Corn and soybean farmer William Hejl checks one of his soybean fields in Amenia, North Dakota, July 6, 2018.

President Ronald Reagan, one of the most prominent, modern conservatives, expressed his dissatisfaction with government agriculture policies, stating, “Has there ever been a better example of how bad things can get when governments get too involved? Expensive, destructive, taken together, the role of governments in agriculture hurts consumers. It hurts the economies of the less developed countries. It even hurts farmers.” Reagan’s words emphasize the conservative belief that minimizing government interference allows for economic growth and prosperity. In similar fashion, President Dwight Eisenhower, in his book “White House Years: Waging Peace, 1956-1961,” highlighted the issue of federal subsidies creating millionaires under programs designed to protect small farmers. He suggested money ceilings on farm subsidies to avoid such misuse of public resources.  

Conservatives also argue that subsidies perpetuate a cycle of dependency, stifling innovation and discouraging farmers from taking risks. Former Senator Barry Goldwater, the 1964 Republican presidential nominee, passionately advocated for the termination of the farm subsidy program, stating, “[There should be a] prompt and final termination of the farm subsidy program. […] Most farmers want to stand on their own feet. They are prepared to take their chances in the free market.”  

Conservatives who are anti farm subsidies recognize that subsidies can lead to unintended consequences, such as artificially inflated land prices and concentration of benefits among wealthy farmers. Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, raised concerns about the disproportionate allocation of benefits to a small group of wealthy farmers, hindering the entry of young and beginning farmers into the industry. Conservatives contend that the farm subsidy system should be reformed to create a level playing field and ensure that government support is targeted to those truly in need.

Pro Farm Subsidy Conservatives

Those conservatives who are in favor of farm subsidies often speak to how agriculture plays a crucial role in supporting the backbone nations. Even though such conservatives are OK to get most goods from foreign countries, food is seen as a protected good that should be procured domestically, at least in part. As such, they see farm subsidies not as handouts but rather essential investments in our food security and rural economies.  

Moreover, farm subsidies help mitigate the risks that farmers face from unpredictable weather conditions, volatile market prices, and global competition. Supporting farmers through subsidies isn’t just about sustaining their livelihoods; it’s about safeguarding a critical sector that impacts every American’s access to affordable and quality food while preserving our agricultural heritage and the values it represents.