Print
Cite
Feedback
Share

Key Takeaways

  • Climate change refers to the change in global or regional climate patterns and its effects on the inhabitants of Earth. 
  • Some conservatives argue against the severity of climate change, doubting the validity of presented climate models and expressing economic concerns about climate policy. 
  • Conservative beliefs on the severity of climate change exist on a spectrum.

Introduction

A smokestack emitting pollutants into the atmosphere.

Climate change (also known as global warming) is a complex phenomenon that refers to long-term alterations in global or regional climate patterns. It is primarily driven by human activities, particularly the emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, which trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere. 

The consequences of climate change have a range of impacts, including rising global temperatures, more frequent and severe extreme weather events, shifts in precipitation patterns, and disruptions to ecosystems. It also poses significant challenges to various sectors such as agriculture, water resources, health, and biodiversity.[1]

Efforts to address climate change involve mitigation strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation measures to cope with its unavoidable impacts. International agreements, such as The Paris Agreement (an international treaty on climate change adopted in 2015), reflect collaborative attempts to limit global temperature increases.

Conservative Perspective

Conservative beliefs on the severity of climate change exist on a spectrum. However, there are four main reasons why conservatives are skeptical of the severity of climate change. First, conservatives are skeptical about the presented climate models. Second, policies aimed at addressing climate change have major economic impacts. Third, conservatives point to the restraints put on the national sovereignty due to international climate agreements. Fourth, conservative argue for innovative technologies to combat climate change rather than putting severe restrictions and taxes on fossil fuels.

Skepticism about suggested models

Gilda Jackson, walking on her property in Paradise, Texas, noticing the effects of climate change.

While conservatives acknowledge the occurrence of climate change, there is skepticism regarding how much of climate change is human caused (I.e. anthropogenic) vs. how much is due to natural reasons. Some conservatives express skepticism when it comes to climate models, arguing that predicting complex and dynamic systems like the Earth’s climate involves numerous variables and assumptions, making precise forecasting challenging. Conservatives point to instances where past climate models did not accurately predict observed climate changes, which raises doubts about the models’ ability to project future climate scenarios with high confidence.[2]

Conservatives also question the degree to which human activities, such as the burning of fossil fuels, contribute to the observed changes in global climate patterns. This skepticism does not reject the concept of climate change but raises doubts about the degree of human influence compared to natural climate variability. Global warming and cooling periods have been recurring for millennia. For example, there have been dozens of ice ages and warm periods. Scientists have data on these changes ranging back hundreds of thousands of years.

Economic Concerns

Conservatives often prioritize economic considerations when addressing climate change. Often, policies aimed at addressing climate change put economic burdens on industries and individuals, negatively affecting economic growth, job creation, buying power, and competitiveness. An example of this is a carbon tax, which imposes an extra tax on all consumption of carbon. This increases the cost of driving, heating homes, and manufacturing. The intent of a carbon tax is to increase the cost of fossil fuel consumption and subsequently decrease fossil fuel usage. This makes life more expensive for everyone and stresses poor people disproportionately. Conservatives argue against such policies citing concerns about fiscal responsibility, as opposed to their liberal counterparts, who usually support such policies that aim to mitigate the climate impact.[3]

National sovereignty

Some conservatives are cautious about international agreements and treaties aimed at addressing climate change, expressing concerns about protecting national sovereignty. Conservatives worry that global agreements could compromise domestic interests and decision-making, where international commitments impose restrictions on economic activities and domestic policies, potentially limiting a nation’s autonomy. An example of this is concern was seen when President Donald Trump pulled out from the Paris Agreement.

Adaptation and innovation

Rather than focusing solely on mitigation efforts, some conservatives emphasize the importance of adaptation strategies to cope with the impacts of climate change. This may include investments in infrastructure, technology, and disaster preparedness. Moreover, conservatives stress the role of innovation and technological advancements in addressing climate challenges. The argument is that market-driven solutions and advancements in clean energy technologies are more sustainable and effective than government regulations.