Print
Cite
Feedback
Share

The Republican Party was founded in 1854 by men who wanted to stop the extension of slavery into the western territories, and within six years it had elected Abraham Lincoln and split the country. It is the older of the two American parties in continuous name and the younger in origin, and it has changed its economic and foreign policy commitments several times while keeping one constant: it has been the vehicle through which American conservatism, when it has had a vehicle at all, has contested for power.3

That relationship has never been comfortable. The party existed for a century before an organised conservative intellectual movement attached itself to it in the 1950s, and the marriage has produced recurring arguments about which partner sets the terms.

Key Takeaways

  • The party emerged in 1854 out of opposition to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, drawing in northern Whigs, Free Soilers, and anti-slavery Democrats.
  • Lincoln’s election in 1860 triggered secession; Republican Congresses then passed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments.
  • Barry Goldwater’s 1964 nomination lost the election by a historic margin and captured the party’s machinery for the conservative movement.
  • Ronald Reagan’s 1980 victory joined economic liberalisation, anti-communism, and social traditionalism into a governing coalition.
  • The party’s electoral base shifted after 2016 toward working-class voters without university degrees, bringing scepticism of free trade and foreign intervention into a party that had championed both.

History And Context

Abraham Lincoln, the first Republican president, in an 1863 photograph
Abraham Lincoln, elected in 1860 as the first Republican president.

Anti-slavery activists met at Ripon, Wisconsin in March 1854 and at Jackson, Michigan in July of that year, in both cases to organise against Senator Stephen Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska Act, which repealed the Missouri Compromise line and left slavery in the territories to local vote. The new party ran John C. Frémont for president in 1856 and lost. In 1860 it ran Lincoln, won a plurality in a four-way race, and eleven states left the Union.

Reconstruction Republicans wrote black citizenship and voting into the Constitution and then, after the disputed election of 1876, withdrew federal troops from the South. For the next half-century the party governed as the party of tariffs, sound money, and industrial development, holding the presidency for all but sixteen years between 1861 and 1933. It fractured in 1912 when Theodore Roosevelt ran against William Howard Taft, and the Depression reduced it to a regional rump.

The modern realignment began after 1945. William F. Buckley Jr. founded National Review in 1955 and set out to fuse traditionalist, libertarian, and anti-communist strands into a single movement, a project Frank Meyer defended in theoretical terms.2 Barry Goldwater’s The Conscience of a Conservative (1960) put that programme into a political manifesto.1 His 1964 nomination, followed by a landslide defeat, handed the movement the party organisation. Richard Nixon rebuilt the coalition, Reagan won with it in 1980 and 1984, and the Federalist Society, founded in 1982, supplied a generation of judges committed to originalism. Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America produced the first Republican House majority in forty years in 1994. After 2009 the Tea Party revolt against federal spending and the 2016 nomination of Donald Trump moved the party toward trade protection, restricted immigration, and hostility to the professional class that staffs federal agencies.

The Conservative Position

Republicans who work in the conservative tradition argue for a federal government limited to its enumerated powers, with the states as the primary sphere of domestic legislation. The constitutional argument is not administrative preference: a large republic contains genuinely different peoples, and forcing a single answer on abortion, schooling, or policing turns every disagreement into a national struggle for control of one office.

On economics, the party’s conservative wing holds that prosperity comes from private enterprise operating under stable rules, that taxation above a certain level suppresses the activity being taxed, and that regulation written by agencies rather than legislatures escapes the accountability the Constitution assumes. On law, it holds that judges apply the text as understood when it was ratified and that policy changes belong to elected bodies.

On culture, the party has carried the argument that family, congregation, and locality are the institutions in which people are actually formed, and that federal policy has spent decades displacing them. George Nash’s history of the movement traces how these three commitments — order, liberty, and defence against a hostile power — were assembled into a working alliance, and how much argument the assembly required.4

Differing Positions

Critics inside and outside the party observe that its fiscal record contradicts its rhetoric. Federal debt rose under Reagan, under George W. Bush, and under Trump; the party has cut taxes reliably and cut spending almost never. On this reading, limited government functions as a campaign theme rather than a programme, and the entitlement commitments that drive long-run spending have been left untouched by every Republican majority.

Libertarians add that the party abandoned free trade and fiscal restraint after 2016 without replacing them with any coherent alternative. National conservatives reply that the older programme was itself the failure: three decades of trade liberalisation hollowed out manufacturing regions whose voters the party now depends on, and a doctrine that treats capital as free to leave while labour must stay has no claim on the loyalty of workers.

Opponents on the left argue that the party’s constitutional federalism has served, from Reconstruction’s end through the Southern strategy, as a formal cover for particular substantive outcomes. Republicans answer that the constitutional structure has protected minority positions of every kind, and that a doctrine is not refuted by the motives of some who have invoked it.

References

  1. Barry Goldwater, The Conscience of a Conservative (Victor Publishing, 1960).
  2. Frank S. Meyer, In Defense of Freedom: A Conservative Credo (Henry Regnery, 1962).
  3. Lewis L. Gould, Grand Old Party: A History of the Republicans (Random House, 2003).
  4. George H. Nash, The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945 (Basic Books, 1976).
You've read articles over the past year

Will you support conservative education?

A gift of any amount helps keep unique explanatory journalism free for all, and supports our mission to help everyone understand the world, regardless of their ability to pay.One-time contributors join our community of givers and will be kept up to date on the journalism that you help keep free.
One-Time
Monthly
Annually
$10
$20
$50
Other
$5/month
$10/month
$25/month
$50/month
$50/year
$100/year
$150/year
$300/year
Give $10 One-Time