Paleo-conservatism

Introduction

Paleo-conservatism, a term derived from “paleo” meaning ancient or old, emerged in the late 20th century as a distinctive strain of conservatism in the United States. It developed as a response to perceived departures from traditional conservative values within the broader conservative movement.^[1]  The main characteristic of paleo-conservatism that sets it apart from other conservative strains is its advocating for isolationism and non-interference in foreign wars. Paleoconservatives also tend to be skeptical of globalization and internationalism (e.g. multi-lateral free trade agreements), viewing them as potential threats to national sovereignty and identity. They are wary of international agreements and organizations that they believe undermine the autonomy of the nation-state. 

Other key elements of paleo-conservatism include a strong commitment to preserving cultural and societal traditions, advocating for limited government intervention particularly in economic affairs and personal freedoms, and hold a critical stance toward attempts to rapid change in established cultural norms and values. Notable paleoconservatives are Tucker Carlson and Pat Buchanan.

Conservative Perspective

Paleo-conservatives have three main characteristics that differentiates them from other strains of conservatism. First, paleo-conservatives advocate for isolationism and hold critical views of globalization. Second, paleo-conservatives push for a limited government and economic protectionism. Third, immigration is another key issue that paleo-conservatives have a different stance, where they push for limiting mass immigration policies. On the other hand, paleo-conservatives inspire heavily from conservative principles of preserving traditions and resisting rapid social change.

Isolationism and Skepticism on Globalization

Paleo-conservative have a different stance from other conservatives when it comes to foreign policy, which tends to be non-interventionist and isolationist (a policy of avoiding political or economic entanglements with other countries). Paleo-conservative arguments for such isolationism is that a country should not be the world police and instead the focus should be on domestic needs over extensive engagement in international conflicts.^[2] 

Paleo-conservatives argue for economic protectionism and trade tariffs, which sets them apart from other conservatives. The argument is that local industries benefit massively from protection against international competition and that this protects critical, domestic industries. At the same time, paleo-conservatives agree with other conservatives about the need for policies which push for free-market capitalism, along with reduced regulation and pro-business policies.^[3]

Stance on Immigration and Multiculturalism

Paleo-conservatives advocate for more restrictive immigration policies than other conservative groups, often favoring controlled and selective immigration, giving priority to skilled or economically beneficial immigrants. Moreover, paleo-conservatives tend to be cautious about embracing multiculturalism, expressing concerns that it could lead to social fragmentation and a loss of shared values, that’s why they advocate for an immigration policy that limits the entry of individuals perceived as less likely to assimilate, and assert the importance of integration.^[4] 

Paleo-conservatives argue that preserving cultural and societal traditions is important for maintaining social cohesion. They argue that traditions have evolved over generations and represent a collective wisdom that should not be discarded lightly. This view is shared by other conservatives as well, which aims to protecting the foundations of a well-ordered society. Rapid social change can lead to social instability and have unintended consequences. They contend that a measured and cautious approach to societal shifts is necessary to ensure that the changes do not disrupt the social fabric or undermine established norms and values.^[5]